One Australian business has prevented personnel from utilizing the innovation, others are rushing for advice on its cybersecurity ramifications - while federal government ministers are urging caution.

But others have welcomed DeepSeek's arrival, requiring Australia to follow China's lead in establishing effective yet less energy-intensive AI technology.

In the days given that the Chinese company released its R1 artificial intelligence model and publicly launched its chatbot and app, it has actually overthrown the AI industry.

- Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email

Several global industry leaders saw their market price drop after the launch, oke.zone as DeepSeek showed AI might be developed utilizing a portion of the expense and processing required to train models such as ChatGPT or Meta's Llama.

Its arrival might signify a new industry shift, but for government and business, the result is unclear. Whereas ChatGPT's 2022 arrival caught federal governments and companies by surprise as personnel started to check out the new AI innovation, a minimum of for bphomesteading.com the arrival of Deepseek, wakewiki.de some had a playbook.

Business as usual

A spokesperson for Telstra said the company had "a rigorous procedure to assess all AI tools, abilities, and utilize cases in our organization", including a list of approved generative AI tools, and standards on how to use them.

For now at Telstra, DeepSeek is not approved and its use is not motivated (although it's not officially obstructed).

"Our favored partner is MS Copilot, and we're rolling out 21,000 Copilot for Microsoft 365 licences to our staff members."

Other companies sought immediate guidance on whether DeepSeek should be embraced.

Major Australian cybersecurity company CyberCX's executive director of cyber intelligence, Katherine Mansted, said consumers had actually currently approached the business for guidance on whether the technology was safe.

"That's not a surprise, since it seems the entire world has actually been in a little bit of a DeepSeek frenzy - both the economically and market likely and those with the security lens," Mansted said.

DeepSeek and federal government

CyberCX this week took the unusual step of rapidly providing guidance suggesting organisations, including federal government departments and those saving sensitive info, strongly consider limiting access to DeepSeek on work devices.

"We understand that there is no proactive policy here from federal government ... We've been down this road in the past," Mansted said. "We have actually had arguments about TikTok, about Chinese surveillance cameras, about Huawei in the telco network, and we constantly act after the fact, not before the reality ... Here, especially because the risks are around compromise of sensitive info, in terms of any details that you take into this AI assistant: it's going straight to China.

"We believed we needed to act much faster this time."

Under federal AI policy implemented in September 2024, companies have till the end of February 2025 to release transparency files about their usage of AI.

But understanding who makes choices on the particular use of DeepSeek in the federal government has proved challenging. The attorney general of the United States's department, which made the choice to prohibit TikTok use on federal government gadgets, referred queries to the Digital Transformation Agency, which in turn referred enquires to the Department of Home Affairs.

Home Affairs was asked on Thursday for its main policy and did not offer a response by the time of publication.

Familiar arguments ...

Some of the response in Australia to DeepSeek is by now familiar. There have actually been calls to ban the innovation, amidst concern over how the Chinese federal government may access user data - an echo of the days Huawei was banned from the NBN and 5G rollouts in Australia, and more just recently, of the dispute over banning TikTok.

The Australian Strategic Policy Institute, a strong critic of the China federal government, said this week that Australia "can not continue the current approach of responding to each new tech development". It called for a tech method covering AI that included investing in sovereign AI capabilities.

The market minister, Ed Husic, stated on Tuesday it was too early to make a choice on whether DeepSeek was a security threat.

Sign up to Breaking News Australia

Get the most important news as it breaks

"If there is anything that presents a risk in the national interest, we will constantly keep an open mind and enjoy what takes place. I believe it's too early to leap to conclusions on that," he said. "But, once again, if we need to act, then accountable governments do."

He stressed that Australia is "in the final stages" of preparing its action and would establish its own regulatory settings.

"The US is flagging their technique. The EU has theirs. Canada also will have a different approach. And our regional partners as well are looking at this," he stated.